Betfred Founder Warns Proposed Machine Gaming Duty Increase Could Threaten Retail Betting Shops
Written by Lars Schröder · Sep 23, 2026

Betfred Founder Warns Proposed Machine Gaming Duty Increase Could Threaten Retail Betting Shops

Fred Done, founder of Betfred, has issued a direct warning that a potential doubling of Machine Gaming Duty from 20% to 40% under consideration by Chancellor John Healey ahead of the Autumn Budget could accelerate the closure of hundreds of UK betting shops and place the entire retail betting sector on a path toward elimination by 2030.
The statement comes as operators continue to absorb the effects of the Remote Gambling Duty increase scheduled for April 2026, which already prompted Betfred to close 132 shops and William Hill to shut 200 locations, and it arrives against a backdrop of ongoing high street pressures that include rising taxes and wage costs.
Background on the Proposed Tax Change
Chancellor John Healey is reportedly reviewing options that would lift Machine Gaming Duty from its current 20% rate to 40%, a move that would apply directly to gaming machines located inside betting shops across the country, and Done's intervention highlights how such an adjustment might compound existing financial strains on operators who have already reduced their physical footprints in recent months.
Those who've tracked the sector note that retail betting outlets have faced successive cost increases, with the April 2026 duty rise serving as the most recent example that contributed to the 132 Betfred closures and 200 William Hill closures announced earlier.
Projected Impacts Outlined by Fred Done
Done projected that the Machine Gaming Duty hike would trigger 495 additional shop closures within a single year, accompanied by 2,575 job losses and a £67 million reduction in tax revenue flowing to the Exchequer, figures that illustrate the scale of contraction observers associate with sustained tax pressure on the remaining retail estate.
The projections build on the pattern established by the earlier round of closures, where operators responded to the Remote Gambling Duty adjustment by rationalising their shop networks rather than absorbing the full cost increase across unchanged operations.

Context of Recent Shop Closures and Sector Pressures
Betfred's decision to close 132 shops followed the confirmation of the April 2026 Remote Gambling Duty increase, while William Hill executed a parallel reduction of 200 stores under the same tax adjustment, and both moves occurred amid wider challenges that include elevated business rates and wage inflation affecting high street retailers generally.
Industry statistics from the Gambling Commission annual report covering April 2025 to March 2026 provide the baseline data against which these reductions are measured, showing how physical retail outlets have already declined before any further duty increase takes effect.
Longer-Term Outlook for Retail Betting
Done indicated that repeated tax escalations could remove retail betting from UK high streets entirely by 2030, a timeline that factors in both the immediate closures expected from the proposed Machine Gaming Duty change and the cumulative effect of prior duty adjustments that have already prompted operators to scale back their shop portfolios.
Those monitoring the sector point out that the combination of the April 2026 Remote Gambling Duty rise and the potential Machine Gaming Duty adjustment would represent successive cost increases within a short period, leaving operators with fewer options to maintain unprofitable locations while meeting wage and operational obligations.
Conclusion
The warning from Betfred's founder centres on specific projections of 495 further closures, 2,575 job losses and £67 million in lost Exchequer revenue if Machine Gaming Duty doubles, and it situates these outcomes within the sequence of reductions already underway following the April 2026 duty changes at both Betfred and William Hill.
Observers continue to track how the Autumn Budget decision on the proposed rate change will interact with the existing retail environment shaped by prior tax adjustments and broader high street economics.